Recommended soundtrack: In the jail house now

Nansen Field: Nan, Feld, I

• Hansen

• Ha n son

• Oz see I A

• Zodiac

The Zodiac serviced Zennon Hansen of MAC Trucks and managed his foundation of 10,000,000 providing independence whenever he wanted it. Photos show how the Zodiac blends his planning process with players in his life Nan, Hanson, Ha son, “YO” or I in Spanish in the landscape, Phi sign recurring theme in his life including a letter of his fraternity Phi Delta Theta of University of Nebraska.

The Layer 1 - scores are based on the following criteria:

Product Vision:

Innovation and performance of AI chipsets and hardware
Alignment with market trends and customer needs
Breadth of product portfolio and use case coverage
Roadmap and future development plans

Ability to Execute

Financial strength and resources
Market presence and adoption
Ecosystem and partnership development
Execution track record and customer satisfaction

Public companies generally have higher Ability to Execute scores due to their greater financial resources, market presence, and established ecosystems. NVIDIA, TSMC, and Intel lead the pack in terms of both Product Vision and Ability to Execute, thanks to their cutting-edge AI hardware offerings and strong market positions.

Private companies, while often exhibiting strong Product Vision, may have lower Ability to Execute scores due to their relatively limited financial resources and market presence compared to their public counterparts. However, companies like Graphcore, Cerebras, and SambaNova are making significant strides in developing innovative AI hardware solutions and are attracting substantial investment from venture capital firms.

Please note that these scores are based on my assessment of the available information and may be subjective. The actual scores might vary depending on the specific criteria used and the latest market developments.

Bottom Line

The AI Chips & Hardware Infrastructure layer is a highly competitive and rapidly evolving market, with a mix of established public companies and innovative private startups vying for leadership. Based on the Product Vision and Ability to Execute scores, the following categories emerge:

Leaders

NVIDIA, TSMC, and Intel are the clear leaders in the AI hardware market, with high scores in both Product Vision and Ability to Execute. These companies have a strong track record of delivering cutting-edge AI hardware solutions, robust ecosystems, and significant financial resources to maintain their market dominance.

Visionaries

Graphcore, Cerebras, and SambaNova stand out as visionaries in the AI hardware space, with impressive Product Vision scores. These companies are pushing the boundaries of AI hardware innovation, developing novel architectures and solutions that cater to the growing demands of AI workloads. While their Ability to Execute scores may be lower than the public leaders, these visionaries are attracting significant interest and investment from the venture capital community.

Niche Players

Companies like Groq, Mythic AI, Cambricon, Wave Computing, and Horizon Robotics can be considered niche players in the AI hardware market. These companies offer specialized solutions for specific use cases or target markets, such as edge computing, IoT devices, or graph neural networks. While they may not have the broad market presence or financial resources of the leaders, these niche players can still capture significant value by addressing specific customer needs and market segments.

Consolidators

The AI hardware market is likely to see consolidation in the coming years, driven by the rapid pace of innovation, high development costs, and the need for scale. Public companies with strong financial positions and broad product portfolios, such as NVIDIA, Intel, and AMD, are well-positioned to be consolidators in this market. These companies may acquire smaller, specialized AI hardware startups to enhance their product offerings, gain access to new technologies, and expand their market presence.

Additionally, some of the visionaries and niche players may become attractive acquisition targets for the consolidators as they mature and demonstrate strong market traction. For example, Intel's acquisition of Habana Labs highlights the potential for consolidation in this space.

Overall, the AI Chips & Hardware Infrastructure layer is poised for significant growth and innovation, driven by the increasing demand for high-performance AI hardware across various industries. The leaders, visionaries, and niche players will all play crucial roles in shaping the future of this market, while the consolidators will drive the industry towards greater scale and efficiency.

Ranked Vendor List:

NVIDIA (NVDA) - 9.8
TSMC (TSM) - 9.4
Intel (INTC) - 9.0
AMD (AMD) - 9.0
Xilinx (AMD) - 8.6
Marvell (MRVL) - 8.6
Broadcom (AVGO) - 8.5
Graphcore (Private) - 8.5
Qualcomm (QCOM) - 8.3
Cerebras (Private) - 8.2
SambaNova (Private) - 8.2
Ampere (Private) - 8.1
Habana (Intel) - 8.0
Horizon (Private) - 7.9
Mythic AI (Private) - 7.8
Groq (Private) - 7.8
Synaptics (SYNA) - 7.7
Cambricon (Private) - 7.7
Microchip (MCHP) - 7.6
Wave Computing (Private) - 7.3

The ranking is based on the sum of the Product Vision and Ability to Execute scores for each vendor. In cases where the total scores are tied, the vendors are ranked alphabetically.

Recommended soundtrack: Furry Lewis – “Kassie Jones”

—————————————————————-

Layer 1 - AI Chips & Hardware Infrastructure:
Public Companies:

1. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA)

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI accelerators with large HBM2 memory for datacenter and high-performance computing applications.

2. Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC)

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI inference processors for datacenter applications.

3. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD)

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI accelerators for datacenter and high-performance computing applications.

4. Qualcomm Incorporated (NASDAQ: QCOM)

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI inference accelerators for edge computing and datacenter applications.

5. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (NYSE: TSM)

* Unique Advantage: Advanced process technologies for high-performance AI chips and accelerators.

6. Xilinx, Inc. (NASDAQ: XLNX)

* Unique Advantage: High-performance adaptive compute acceleration platform for AI and data analytics workloads.

7. Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ: MCHP)

* Unique Advantage: High-performance field-programmable gate arrays with support for AI and machine learning applications.

8. Synaptics Incorporated (NASDAQ: SYNA)

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI processors for edge computing and IoT devices.

9. Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: MRVL)

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI processors for datacenter and high-performance computing applications.

10. Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ: AVGO)

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI processors for datacenter and high-performance computing applications.

Private Companies:

1. Graphcore

* Chief Venture Backers: Atomico, BMW i Ventures, Dell Technologies Capital, Draper Esprit, Fidelity Investments, Foundation Capital, Mayfair Equity Partners, Microsoft, Robert Bosch Venture Capital, Samsung Catalyst Fund, and others.

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI processors for datacenter and high-performance computing applications.

2. Cerebras Systems

* Chief Venture Backers: Altimeter Capital, Benchmark, Coatue Management, Eclipse Ventures, Foundation Capital, and others.

* Unique Advantage: Wafer-scale AI processors for high-performance computing and AI research.

3. SambaNova Systems

* Chief Venture Backers: BlackRock, GV, Intel Capital, SK Hynix, and Walden International.

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI systems for datacenter and high-performance computing applications.

4. Groq

* Chief Venture Backers: Social Capital, XN, and others.

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI processors for graph neural network applications.

5. Mythic AI

* Chief Venture Backers: Lux Capital, SoftBank Vision Fund, and others.

* Unique Advantage: High-performance analog AI processors for edge computing and IoT devices.

6. Habana Labs (acquired by Intel)

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI inference processors for datacenter applications.

7. Cambricon Technologies

* Chief Venture Backers: Alibaba, China Mobile, and others.

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI processors for datacenter and high-performance computing applications.

8. Wave Computing

* Chief Venture Backers: Tallwood Venture Capital, HP Tech Ventures, and others.

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI processors for datacenter and high-performance computing applications.

9. Horizon Robotics

* Chief Venture Backers: Hillhouse Capital, Intel Capital, and others.

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI processors for edge computing and autonomous machines.

10. Ampere Computing

* Chief Venture Backers: The Carlyle Group, and others.

* Unique Advantage: High-performance AI processors for datacenter and high-performance computing applications.

These companies, both public and private, are focused on developing and manufacturing high-performance AI chips and hardware infrastructure to support the growing demand for AI applications across various industries. They offer unique solutions that cater to different market segments, such as datacenter, edge computing, and IoT devices.

Recommended soundtrack: Greta Van Fleet - Highway Tune

Report on Israel's Artificial Intelligence Preparedness

Executive Summary

Israel, often referred to as the "Startup Nation," has demonstrated remarkable potential in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). The country's robust startup ecosystem, talented workforce, and supportive environment position it favorably for developing cutting-edge AI technologies. Israel's preparedness across critical factors related to AI development is impressive, indicating its ambition to become a leading AI hub.

This report assesses Israel's strengths and areas for growth in the AI domain. It analyzes the country's natural resources, human capital, research and development ecosystem, infrastructure, and more. The findings suggest that Israel's integrated approach to AI, harnessing its unique advantages, places it in a competitive position on the global AI stage.

Key Findings

Strong Human Capital

Israel boasts a highly skilled workforce, particularly in STEM fields, supported by a top-tier education system. The country's entrepreneurial culture and mandatory military service contribute to a vibrant talent pool.

Robust Research & Development

Substantial investment in AI R&D, leading research institutions, and a dynamic startup ecosystem drive Israel's innovative capabilities.

Advanced Infrastructure

Israel has developed a robust technological infrastructure, including high-speed internet and advanced data centers, supporting AI development and deployment.

Government Support

The Israeli government actively fosters AI innovation through funding, initiatives, and a supportive regulatory environment. Organizations like the Israel Innovation Authority play a pivotal role.

Vibrant Industry Partnerships: Strong collaborations between industry, academia, and the government characterize Israel's AI landscape. The country's startup ecosystem and tech-oriented culture promote dynamic partnerships.

Good Data Availability: Israel provides relatively easy access to quality data, and the country encourages open data initiatives while maintaining a focus on data privacy and security.

Growing Ethical Awareness: Israel is increasingly aware of AI ethical considerations, with ongoing discussions and the development of ethical guidelines. However, further enhancements in this area are recommended.

Talented Workforce: Israel attracts and retains AI talent, fostering a continuous talent pipeline. The country's focus on upskilling and international attraction initiatives strengthens its position.

Promising Market Potential: The domestic AI market in Israel has good growth potential, and the early adoption of AI across industries provides a favorable environment for AI companies.

Recommendations

Sustain Investment in AI Education: Israel should continue investing in AI education at all levels, ensuring a steady stream of talented professionals. Encouraging STEM education and providing scholarships and grants for AI-related studies can enhance the talent pool.

Foster International Collaboration: Israel's vibrant startup ecosystem can benefit from increased international collaboration and knowledge sharing. Encouraging partnerships with foreign AI hubs can expand access to diverse perspectives and resources.

Address Ethical Concerns: Enhance AI ethics frameworks, encourage public discussions, and ensure the responsible development and deployment of AI technologies to address growing ethical concerns. Developing clear guidelines and regulations can improve public trust.

Leverage Data Potential: Israel should further develop its data infrastructure and encourage the responsible use of data. Promoting open data initiatives and ensuring data privacy and security will enhance the country's AI capabilities.

Maintain Government Support: Continue government support for AI through funding, incentives, and regulatory frameworks. Streamline the translation of research into commercial applications and encourage public-private partnerships.

Conclusion:

Israel's preparedness and strategic approach position it as a prominent player in the global AI arena. By building upon its strengths and addressing the identified areas for improvement, Israel can solidify its role as a leading AI innovation hub. The country's dynamic ecosystem, talented workforce, and supportive environment are key assets in this rapidly evolving field.

Israel's potential to influence and contribute to the AI revolution is significant, and its proactive approach to partnerships, research, and innovation places it in a promising position for the future.

Research Note

Joint AI Preparedness of Russia and China

Overview
This research note explores the combined potential of Russia and China, two major global powers, in developing a world-leading AI system. By examining their resources, capabilities, and collaborative advantages, we assess their preparedness to become dominant players in the AI domain.

Factor Analysis:

Natural Resources

Both Russia and China are rich in natural resources, including rare earth minerals and energy sources. Their geographic advantages and robust industrial bases provide a strong foundation for AI hardware development. Rating: 5

Human Capital

Russia and China have large populations and significant talent pools, with a focus on STEM education. China, in particular, invests heavily in education and has produced a considerable number of AI specialists. Rating: 4

Research & Development

Substantial investment in AI research and development is evident in both countries. Russia and China have prominent research institutions and increasing collaboration between their academic communities. Rating: 4.5

Infrastructure

Russia and China are developing robust technological infrastructures. Both countries have made considerable progress in building high-speed internet networks and establishing data centers. Rating: 4

Government Support

AI development is a priority for both governments, with active support through funding, initiatives, and regulatory frameworks. Russia's National Technology Initiative and China's Next Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan are examples of their commitment. Rating: 5

Industry Partnerships

In Russia and China, collaborations between industry and academia are growing. Each country has a large and developing tech industry, fostering an environment for partnerships. Rating: 4

Data Availability

Both countries have accessible data resources and are developing data infrastructure. China has a vast pool of data, while Russia focuses on data localization and security. Rating: 3.5

Ethical Considerations

There is an increasing focus on AI ethics in both societies. Russia and China have established ethical guidelines, but concerns related to data privacy and surveillance exist. Rating: 3

Talent Pipeline

Russia and China have substantial pools of AI talent, with China benefiting from its large population and educational reforms. Russia attracts talent through its focus on research and innovation. Rating: 4

Market Potential

The domestic AI markets in Russia and China are dynamic and offer significant growth potential. Both countries have large economies with increasing AI adoption across industries. Rating: 5

Overall Assessment

Russia and China's combined efforts yield a competitive advantage in the AI domain. Their high ratings in natural resources, government support, and market potential form a solid foundation. Collaborative initiatives between the two countries, such as the recent AI research center, demonstrate a proactive approach to AI development.

However, there are areas for improvement. Moderate ratings in infrastructure, industry partnerships, and ethical considerations suggest room for enhancement, especially in developing robust technological ecosystems and fostering international collaborations.

Implications

The joint potential of Russia and China in AI is substantial, backed by their economic might, large populations, and focus on technological advancement. Their strategic collaborations and shared goals could create a powerful AI alliance.

To further strengthen their position, both nations should continue to invest in infrastructure development, encourage industry partnerships, and enhance ethical frameworks. Addressing data privacy concerns and fostering international collaboration could contribute significantly to their AI endeavors.

This assessment highlights the emerging AI alliance between Russia and China and its potential impact on the global AI landscape. Their integrated approach, leveraging each other's strengths, could make them key drivers of AI innovation and adoption. The combined efforts of these nations should not be understated in assessing the future of AI.

P.S.

Research Note: China's Strategic Approach to AI Development

Overview

This research note examines China's strategic approach to AI development, leveraging its geopolitical position and economic might to foster AI innovation. By playing Russia and the United States against each other, China seeks to enhance its AI capabilities and gain a competitive edge in the global AI race.

Factor Analysis

Natural Resources

China has moderate natural resources, including some rare earth minerals, but lacks certain crucial resources for AI hardware infrastructure. The country compensates by forming strategic partnerships with resource-rich nations like Russia, ensuring access to these critical materials. Rating: 3

Human Capital

China has a large population and a growing number of skilled professionals, particularly in STEM fields. The country focuses on education and has produced a significant talent pool in AI. Rating: 4

Research & Development

China invests heavily in AI research and development, with substantial government and private sector funding. The country encourages international collaborations, attracting researchers and institutions from Russia and the West. Rating: 4.5

Infrastructure

China has significantly improved its technological infrastructure, with expanding high-speed internet coverage and advanced data center capabilities. The country's rapid urbanization and technology focus support infrastructure development. Rating: 4

Government Support

AI development is a national priority in China, with robust government funding and initiatives. The Next Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan outlines the country's ambitions and provides support for research and industry. Rating: 5

Industry Partnerships

China fosters strong collaborations between its tech industry, academia, and government. The country also attracts foreign investment and technology transfers, including from the United States, to enhance its AI capabilities. Rating: 4.5

Data Availability

China has a vast pool of data and a focus on data localization. The country's data privacy and security laws, while stringent, provide a controlled environment for AI development. Rating: 4

Ethical Considerations

China's AI ethics discussions are evolving, but a comprehensive framework is needed to address growing concerns. The country's emphasis on surveillance and data privacy might hinder ethical progress. Rating: 3

Talent Pipeline

China produces a large number of AI professionals and continues to invest in educational reforms to enhance its talent pool. The country also attracts foreign experts, providing access to diverse skill sets. Rating: 4.5

Market Potential

The Chinese AI market is vast and offers immense growth opportunities. The country's rapid economic development, urbanisation, and government support for AI adoption across sectors create a favorable environment for companies and investors. Rating: 5

Overall Assessment
China's strategic approach positions it well for AI leadership. By playing Russia and the United States as potential partners, China gains access to resources, technology, and markets. Its large domestic market, substantial investment in AI, and focus on collaboration provide a strong foundation for development.

However, ethical considerations, data privacy issues, and talent gaps remain areas of concern. Addressing these challenges is crucial for China to establish a sustainable and responsible AI ecosystem.

Implications
China's strategy leverages its market size, economic influence, and strategic partnerships to accelerate AI development. By promising access to its vast market and resources, China encourages Russia and the United States to share their AI expertise and technologies.

To succeed in this approach, China should continue to open its market, foster international collaborations, and enhance ethical standards. Ongoing investment in infrastructure, talent development, and industry partnerships will further strengthen its AI capabilities.

China's strategic maneuverings highlight its determination to become a global AI leader. Its integrated approach, combining domestic capabilities with international partnerships, could make it a dominant force in shaping the AI landscape. The country's ambitions and tactics should be carefully considered by other nations in their AI strategies.

Overview

This research note evaluates the United States' preparedness for developing a world-dominating AI system, examining the country's resources and capabilities across critical factors. As a global superpower with a large economy and diverse population, the United States has the potential to be a foremost leader in the AI domain.

Factor Analysis

Natural Resources

The United States is rich in natural resources, including rare earth minerals and energy sources. Its geographic endowments and robust mining industry provide a solid foundation for AI hardware infrastructure development. Rating: 5

Human Capital

The United States boasts a large and highly skilled workforce, particularly in STEM fields. Top-tier educational institutions and a strong focus on research and development foster an excellent talent pool. The country attracts international talent, adding to its human capital advantage. Rating: 4.5

Research & Development

Substantial government and private sector investment drives robust AI research and development in the United States. Leading technology companies and research institutions, like MIT and Stanford, are at the forefront of AI innovation. Rating: 5

Infrastructure

The United States has well-developed technological infrastructure, with extensive high-speed internet connectivity and advanced data center capabilities. The availability of digital resources and services is widespread. Rating: 5

Government Support

The U.S. government actively supports AI development through initiatives like the American AI Initiative and funding from organizations such as the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). A generally supportive regulatory environment encourages AI growth. Rating: 4.5

Industry Partnerships

Strong collaborations exist between industry leaders, startups, and academia in the United States. The country's mature tech industry and entrepreneurial culture promote vibrant partnerships and a dynamic AI ecosystem. Rating: 5

Data Availability

The United States has good access to high-quality data resources, with a focus on open data initiatives and robust data infrastructure. Data privacy and security laws, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), ensure responsible data management. Rating: 4

Ethical Considerations

There is a growing discussion on AI ethics in the United States, with various think tanks and institutions addressing societal impact concerns. The country has developed ethical guidelines, and the public is increasingly engaged in AI ethics discussions. Rating: 3.5

Talent Pipeline

The United States produces a large number of AI specialists and attracts talent from around the world. Top universities and a culture of entrepreneurship foster a continuous stream of AI talent. Rating: 4.5

Market Potential

The vast domestic AI market, early adoption across industries, and a mature tech sector provide a favorable environment for AI companies and investors. The United States has significant economic potential and a dynamic AI ecosystem. Rating: 5

Overall Assessment

The United States scores highly across most factors, demonstrating its exceptional preparedness for developing a sophisticated AI system. Its strengths lie in natural resources, research and development, infrastructure, industry partnerships, and market potential. The country's established technological leadership and robust ecosystem position it as a foremost contender in the AI realm.

However, there are areas where improvement can be made. Moderate ratings in human capital and ethical considerations suggest room for enhancement. Addressing issues related to talent gaps and ensuring a diverse and inclusive AI workforce are important considerations.

Implications

The United States' extensive resources and established tech industry provide a solid foundation for AI leadership. Ongoing investment in AI research, a supportive regulatory environment, and strong industry collaborations further strengthen its position. The country's scale and economic might enable significant AI deployments and applications.

To maintain its leadership, the United States should continue to foster AI education and upskilling, enhance ethical considerations, and promote inclusive workforce development. Ongoing international collaboration and knowledge sharing will also be crucial in driving AI innovation.

The assessment highlights the United States' significant potential to shape the future of AI. Its integrated approach, harnessing the strengths of its extensive resources and advanced ecosystem, positions it as a leading force in the global AI landscape. The country's ongoing commitment to AI development will likely contribute to its dominance in this field for the foreseeable future.Appendix: Relevant Sources

Natural Resources

U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries (https://www.usgs.gov/centers/nmic/mineral-commodity-summaries)

International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook (https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2021)

Human Capital

World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness Report (https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2020)

UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Education Data (http://data.uis.unesco.org/)

Research & Development

OECD, Main Science and Technology Indicators (https://www.oecd.org/sti/msti.htm)

National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators (https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20201)

Infrastructure

World Bank, World Development Indicators (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator)

International Telecommunication Union, ICT Development Index (https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/mis2017/methodology.aspx)

Government Support

OECD, Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook (https://www.oecd.org/sti/oecd-science-technology-and-innovation-outlook-25186167.htm)

National AI policies and strategies (country-specific sources)

Industry Partnerships

Global Innovation Index (https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/)

Crunchbase, Startup Ecosystem Rankings (https://www.crunchbase.com/hub/startup-ecosystems)

Data Availability

Open Data Barometer (https://opendatabarometer.org/)

World Economic Forum, Global Information Technology Report

(https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-information-technology-report-2016)

Ethical Considerations

IEEE Ethically Aligned Design (https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/)

OECD, Recommendations on AI (https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449)

Talent Pipeline

Times Higher Education, World University Rankings (https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings)

LinkedIn, Global Talent Trends (https://business.linkedin.com/talent-solutions/resources/talent-strategy/global-talent-trends)

Market Potential

IDC, Worldwide Artificial Intelligence Spending Guide (https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=IDC_P33198)

PwC, Sizing the Prize: What's the Real Value of AI for Your Business and How Can You Capitalise? (https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/data-and-analytics/publications/artificial-intelligence-study.html)

Note: The sources provided are examples and may need to be updated or replaced with more recent and relevant sources depending on the specific country and assessment context.

Article - The Conversation

Why did humans take over the world while our closest relatives, the Neanderthals, became extinct? It's possible we were just smarter, but there's surprisingly little evidence that's true.

Neanderthals had big brains, language and sophisticated tools. They made art and jewelry. They were smart, suggesting a curious possibility. Maybe the crucial differences weren't at the individual level, but in our societies.

Two hundred and fifty thousand years ago, Europe and western Asia were Neanderthal lands. Homo sapiens inhabited southern Africa. Estimates vary but perhaps 100,000 years ago, modern humans migrated out of Africa.

Forty thousand years ago Neanderthals disappeared from Asia and Europe, replaced by humans. Their slow, inevitable replacement suggests humans had some advantage, but not what it was.

Anthropologists once saw Neanderthals as dull-witted brutes. But recent archaeological finds show they rivaled us in intelligence.

Neanderthals mastered fire before we did. They were deadly hunters, taking big game like mammoths and wooly rhinos, and small animals like rabbits and birds.

They gathered plants, seeds and shellfish. Hunting and foraging all those species demanded deep understanding of nature.

Neanderthals also had a sense of beauty, making beads and cave paintings. They were spiritual people, burying their dead with flowers. Stone circles found inside caves may be Neanderthal shrines. Like modern hunter-gatherers, Neanderthal lives were probably steeped in superstition and magic; their skies full of gods, the caves inhabited by ancestor-spirits.

Then there's the fact Homo sapiens and Neanderthals had children together. We weren't that different. But we met Neanderthals many times, over many millennia, always with the same result. They disappeared. We remained.
The hunter-gatherer society

It may be that the key differences were less at the individual level than at the societal level. It's impossible to understand humans in isolation, any more than you can understand a honeybee without considering its colony. We prize our individuality, but our survival is tied to larger social groups, like a bee's fate depends on the colony's survival.

Modern hunter-gatherers provide our best guess at how early humans and Neanderthals lived. People like the Namibia's Khoisan and Tanzania's Hadzabe gather families into wandering bands of ten to 60 people. The bands combine into a loosely organized tribe of a thousand people or more.

These tribes lack hierachical structures, but they're linked by shared language and religion, marriages, kinships and friendships. Neanderthal societies may have been similar but with one crucial difference: smaller social groups.
Tight-knit tribes

What points to this is evidence that Neanderthals had lower genetic diversity.

In small populations, genes are easily lost. If one person in ten carries a gene for curly hair, then in a ten-person band, one death could remove the gene from the population. In a band of fifty, five people would carry the gene—multiple backup copies. So over time, small groups tend to lose genetic variation, ending up with fewer genes.

In 2022, DNA was recovered from bones and teeth of 11 Neanderthals found in a cave in the Altai Mountains of Siberia. Several individuals were related, including a father and a daughter—they were from a single band. And they showed low genetic diversity.

Because we inherit two sets of chromosomes—one from our mother, one from our father—we carry two copies of each gene. Often, we have two different versions of a gene. You might get a gene for blue eyes from your mother, and one for brown eyes from your father.

But the Altai Neanderthals often had one version of each gene. As the study reports, that low diversity suggests they lived in small bands—probably averaging just 20 people.

It's possible Neanderthal anatomy favored small groups. Being robust and muscular, Neanderthals were heavier than us. So each Neanderthal needed more food, meaning the land could support fewer Neanderthals than Homo sapiens.

And Neanderthals may have mainly eaten meat. Meat-eaters would get fewer calories from the land than people who ate meat and plants, again leading to smaller populations.
Group size matters

If humans lived in bigger groups than Neanderthals it could have given us advantages.

Neanderthals, strong and skilled with spears were likely good fighters. Lightly built humans probably countered by using bows to attack at range.

But even if Neanderthals and humans were equally dangerous in battle, if humans also had a numeric advantage they could bring more fighters and absorb more losses.

Big societies have other, subtler advantages. Larger bands have more brains. More brains to solve problems, remember lore about animals and plants, and techniques for crafting tools and sewing clothing. Just as big groups have higher genetic diversity, they'll have higher diversity of ideas.

And more people means more connections. Network connections increase exponentially with network size, following Metcalfe's Law. A 20-person band has 190 possible connections between members, while 60 people have 1770 possible connections.

Information flows through these connections: news about people and movements of animals; toolmaking techniques; and words, songs and myths. Plus the group's behavior becomes increasingly complex.

Consider ants. Individually, ants aren't smart. But interactions between millions of ants lets colonies make elaborate nests, forage for food and kill animals many times an ant's size. Likewise, human groups do things no one person can—design buildings and cars, write elaborate computer programs, fight wars, run companies and countries.

Humans aren't unique in having big brains (whales and elephants have these) or in having huge social groups (zebras and wildebeest form huge herds). But we're unique in combining them.

To paraphrase poet John Dunne, no man—and no Neanderthal—is an island. We're all part of something larger. And throughout history, humans formed larger and larger social groups: bands, tribes, cities, nation states, international alliances.

It may be then that an ability to build large social structures gave Homo sapiens the edge, against nature, and other hominin species.



This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

——-

Here are the top 10 countries by land mass, ranked according to the provided variables:

Russia (17,098,246 km²)
Numeric advantage in conflict: 1
Collective intelligence: 2
Network effects: 1
Emergent complexity: 2

Canada (9,984,670 km²)
Numeric advantage in conflict: 3
Collective intelligence: 3
Network effects: 3
Emergent complexity: 3

United States (9,833,520 km²)
Numeric advantage in conflict: 2
Collective intelligence: 1
Network effects: 2
Emergent complexity: 1

China (9,596,960 km²)
Numeric advantage in conflict: 1
Collective intelligence: 1
Network effects: 1
Emergent complexity: 1

Brazil (8,515,770 km²)
Numeric advantage in conflict: 3
Collective intelligence: 3
Network effects: 3
Emergent complexity: 3

Australia (7,692,024 km²)
Numeric advantage in conflict: 4
Collective intelligence: 4
Network effects: 4
Emergent complexity: 4

India (3,287,263 km²)
Numeric advantage in conflict: 2
Collective intelligence: 2
Network effects: 2
Emergent complexity: 2

Argentina (2,780,400 km²)
Numeric advantage in conflict: 5
Collective intelligence: 5
Network effects: 5
Emergent complexity: 5

Kazakhstan (2,724,900 km²)
Numeric advantage in conflict: 6
Collective intelligence: 6
Network effects: 6
Emergent complexity: 6

Algeria (2,381,741 km²)
Numeric advantage in conflict: 7
Collective intelligence: 7
Network effects: 7
Emergent complexity: 7

Please note that this ranking is based on a subjective assessment of the provided variables, and different interpretations could lead to different rankings.

———-

Here are the countries ranked by total score, with the top 5 countries discussed:

China (Total Score: 4) China, with its large land mass and population, ranks first in terms of numeric advantage in conflict, collective intelligence, network effects, and emergent complexity. Its large population and rapidly developing economy contribute to its high ranking.

United States (Total Score: 6) The United States, with its advanced technology, strong military, and diverse population, ranks second in collective intelligence and emergent complexity. Its well-developed infrastructure and strong global influence contribute to its high ranking.

Russia (Total Score: 6) Russia, with its vast land mass and significant military power, ranks first in numeric advantage in conflict and network effects. Its large population and complex history contribute to its high ranking in emergent complexity.

India (Total Score: 8) India, with its large and diverse population, ranks second in numeric advantage in conflict, collective intelligence, network effects, and emergent complexity. Its rapidly growing economy and increasing global influence contribute to its high ranking.

Brazil (Total Score: 12) Brazil, with its large land mass and diverse population, ranks third in numeric advantage in conflict, collective intelligence, network effects, and emergent complexity. Its growing economy and regional influence contribute to its relatively high ranking.

The remaining countries are ranked as follows:

Canada (Total Score: 12)
Australia (Total Score: 16)
Argentina (Total Score: 20)
Kazakhstan (Total Score: 24)
Algeria (Total Score: 28)
Indonesia (Total Score: 28)
Mexico (Total Score: 32)
Democratic Republic of the Congo (Total Score: 32)
Saudi Arabia (Total Score: 36)
Iran (Total Score: 36)
Sudan (Total Score: 40)
Peru (Total Score: 40)
Ethiopia (Total Score: 40)
Egypt (Total Score: 44)
Libya (Total Score: 44)
South Africa (Total Score: 44)
Mongolia (Total Score: 48)
Colombia (Total Score: 48)
Chad (Total Score: 52)
Angola (Total Score: 52)
Tanzania (Total Score: 52)
Bolivia (Total Score: 56)
Niger (Total Score: 56)
Mali (Total Score: 60)
Mauritania (Total Score: 64)

Time Waves: A Speculative Concept in Applied Selection Theory

Introduction

Applied Selection Theory, a theoretical framework that explores the predictable mass and architecture of black holes in solar systems, also introduces the concept of time waves. This report examines the idea of time waves, their potential properties, and their implications for our understanding of the nature of time and the universe.

The Concept of Time Waves

Time waves are a speculative concept proposed by Applied Selection Theory, which suggests that time, like other physical quantities, may exhibit wave-like properties. According to this theory, time waves are hypothetical fluctuations or oscillations in the fabric of spacetime that propagate through the universe, potentially carrying information about the past, present, and future.

The idea of time waves is rooted in the principles of general relativity, which describes gravity as the curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of mass and energy. Applied Selection Theory extends this concept by proposing that the flow of time itself may have a wave-like nature, and that these time waves could interact with the gravitational fields of massive objects, such as black holes.

Properties of Time Waves

While the specific properties of time waves are still largely speculative, Applied Selection Theory suggests that they may possess certain characteristics, including:

Frequency

Time waves may have different frequencies, corresponding to different scales of temporal oscillation. These frequencies could potentially be related to the fundamental constants of the universe, such as the speed of light or the Planck time.

Amplitude

The amplitude of time waves may represent the intensity or magnitude of temporal fluctuations. Higher amplitude time waves could potentially indicate more significant distortions in the fabric of spacetime.

Propagation at the speed of awareness

Time waves are thought to propagate through the universe at a certain speed, possibly related to the speed of the light. The propagation of time waves could potentially be influenced by the presence of massive objects, such as black holes or galaxies.

Interaction with Matter and Energy

Time waves may interact with matter and energy in the universe, potentially influencing the behavior of particles and fields. These interactions could manifest as subtle variations in the flow of time or the synchronization of physical processes.

Implications for the Nature of Time

The existence of time waves, if confirmed, would have profound implications for our understanding of the nature of time and its role in the universe. Some potential consequences include:

Non-linearity of Time

The presence of time waves suggests that time may not always flow in a linear, unidirectional manner. The propagation and interaction of time waves could potentially lead to local variations in the flow of time or even the possibility of time loops or reversals.

Temporal Entanglement

Just as quantum particles can become entangled, sharing information across space, time waves could potentially exhibit a form of temporal entanglement. This entanglement could manifest as correlations between events separated in time, challenging our notions of causality and free will.

Time as a Fundamental Force

The existence of time waves may indicate that time is not merely a passive background against which events unfold, but rather an active, dynamic force that shapes the evolution of the universe. This perspective could potentially lead to the development of new theories that unify time with the other fundamental forces of nature, such as gravity and electromagnetism.

Challenges and Future Research

The concept of time waves, as proposed by Applied Selection Theory, is highly speculative and currently lacks empirical evidence. Several challenges and areas for future research must be addressed to validate and refine this idea:

Theoretical Foundations

The mathematical and physical foundations of time waves need to be rigorously developed and tested against existing theories, such as general relativity and quantum mechanics. This may require the creation of new theoretical frameworks that can accommodate the wave-like properties of time.

Observational Evidence

Detecting and measuring time waves presents a significant challenge, as their effects may be subtle and difficult to distinguish from other phenomena. Novel experimental techniques and technologies may be necessary to observe and characterize time waves, such as ultra-precise clocks or gravitational wave detectors.

Implications for Physics and Cosmology

The existence of time waves could have far-reaching consequences for our understanding of physics and the evolution of the universe. Researchers must explore how time waves might influence the behavior of matter and energy at different scales, from the quantum realm to the cosmic horizon.

Philosophical and Metaphysical Questions

The idea of time waves raises profound philosophical and metaphysical questions about the nature of time, causality, and the human experience. Engaging with these questions will require collaboration between scientists, philosophers, and scholars from various disciplines to grapple with the implications of this concept.

Conclusion
The concept of time waves, as proposed by Applied Selection Theory, represents a bold and speculative idea that challenges our current understanding of time and its role in the universe. While the existence of time waves remains unconfirmed, the exploration of this concept has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the fundamental nature of reality.

Further theoretical and empirical work is needed to validate and refine the idea of time waves, and to address the numerous challenges and questions that arise from this concept. If confirmed, the existence of time waves could lead to groundbreaking advances in physics, cosmology, and our philosophical understanding of time and the universe.

As research into Applied Selection Theory and the concept of time waves continues, it is essential to maintain a balance between scientific rigor and creative speculation. By pushing the boundaries of our current knowledge and embracing new ideas, we may unlock profound insights into the mysteries of the universe and our place within it.

Applied Selection Theory: Predictable Mass and Architecture of Black Holes in Solar Systems

Introduction
Applied Selection Theory proposes that black holes with a mass approximately equal to that of the Sun exist within many solar systems containing stars beyond a certain mass threshold. Furthermore, the theory suggests that these black holes have a predictable mass and exhibit predictable shapes within their architecture. This report explores the implications of these predictions and their potential impact on our understanding of black holes and solar system formation.

Predictable Mass of Black Holes
According to Applied Selection Theory, black holes within solar systems containing stars above a certain mass threshold tend to have a mass similar to that of the Sun. This prediction is based on the idea that the formation and evolution of these solar systems are influenced by a common set of physical processes and conditions that lead to the creation of black holes with a specific mass range.

To calculate the expected size of such a black hole, we can use the Schwarzschild radius equation, which defines the event horizon of a non-rotating black hole:

R_s = (2GM)/c^2

where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the black hole, and c is the speed of light.

Assuming a black hole with a mass equal to that of our Sun (M_sun ≈ 1.989 × 10^30 kg), we can calculate the Schwarzschild radius:

R_s = (2 × 6.674 × 10^-11 m^3 kg^-1 s^-2 × 1.989 × 10^30 kg) / (2.998 × 10^8 m/s)^2
R_s ≈ 2,950 m ≈ 2.95 km

This result suggests that a black hole with a mass similar to the Sun would have a Schwarzschild radius of approximately 2.95 km, corresponding to a diameter of about 5.9 km.

Predictable Shapes within Black Hole Architecture
Applied Selection Theory also posits that the internal architecture of these black holes exhibits predictable shapes. While the exact nature of these shapes is not yet fully understood, the theory suggests that they are a result of the fundamental physical processes governing the formation and evolution of black holes.

One possibility is that the intense gravitational fields and extreme warping of spacetime within the black hole create stable, symmetric structures that are consistent across black holes of similar mass. These structures could potentially include:

1) Spherical or toroidal event horizons

2) Symmetric gravitational field lines

3) Regular patterns in the distribution of matter and energy within the black hole

The presence of these predictable shapes could have significant implications for our understanding of black hole physics and the behavior of matter and energy under extreme conditions.

Implications for Solar System Formation
The existence of black holes with predictable masses and architectures within solar systems raises questions about their role in the formation and evolution of these systems. Applied Selection Theory suggests that these black holes may play a crucial role in shaping the properties of their host solar systems, such as:

1) Influencing the distribution and orbits of planets and other celestial bodies

2) Regulating the accretion of matter and the formation of stars

3) Affecting the overall stability and long-term evolution of the solar system

Further research is needed to explore the specific mechanisms through which these black holes interact with their surroundings and the extent to which they contribute to the observed characteristics of solar systems.

Challenges and Future Research
While Applied Selection Theory offers intriguing predictions about the mass and architecture of black holes in solar systems, several challenges and areas for future research remain:

Observational Evidence: Detecting and studying black holes within solar systems is a significant challenge due to their small size and the limitations of current observational techniques. Advanced telescopes and innovative methods will be necessary to gather empirical evidence supporting the predictions of Applied Selection Theory.

Theoretical Foundations: The underlying physical principles and mechanisms that give rise to the predictable mass and shapes of black holes in solar systems need to be further developed and refined. This may require advances in our understanding of general relativity, quantum mechanics, and the physics of extreme environments.

Formation Mechanisms

The specific conditions and processes that lead to the formation of black holes with predictable masses and architectures within solar systems must be investigated in detail. This may involve simulations of solar system formation and evolution, as well as the study of the properties of stars and their environments.

Implications for Astrophysics

The consequences of Applied Selection Theory for our understanding of astrophysical phenomena, such as galaxy formation, dark matter distribution, and the evolution of the universe, should be explored. The presence of predictable black holes in solar systems may have far-reaching implications that extend beyond the scale of individual star systems.

Conclusion
Applied Selection Theory proposes that black holes with a mass approximately equal to that of the Sun and predictable shapes within their architecture exist within many solar systems containing stars above a certain mass threshold. This theory has the potential to significantly advance our understanding of black holes, solar system formation, and the fundamental physical processes governing the universe.

However, substantial observational evidence and theoretical work are needed to validate and refine the predictions of Applied Selection Theory. Future research should focus on detecting and studying these black holes, developing the underlying physical principles, investigating the formation mechanisms, and exploring the broader implications for astrophysics.

If confirmed, Applied Selection Theory could revolutionize our understanding of the role of black holes in shaping the properties of solar systems and provide new insights into the fundamental nature of the universe. It is an exciting area of research that promises to push the boundaries of our knowledge and inspire new avenues of scientific inquiry.

Recommendations for Forrester

Expand AI and chatbot offerings to compete in the growing conversational AI market. Develop AI-powered customer support, employee engagement, and market research solutions.

Develop general intelligence consulting services to help clients understand and harness AI across their organizations. Offer AI strategy, ethics guidance, and technology selection services.

Enhance industry depth and expertise by hiring experienced consultants, acquiring specialized firms, and developing targeted offerings to better serve clients' unique needs.

Bold Path to Defeat Gartner

With its strong cash position of $117.7M and access to capital markets, Forrester should aggressively pursue acquisitions and investments in

AI technologies, focusing on:

1) AI chipset manufacturers to optimize workload performance

2) AI platform providers to enhance modeling and deployment capabilities

3) Industry-specific AI startups to expand into new verticals

4) Knowledge sharing platforms to facilitate AI collaboration

By strategically deploying its financial resources to expand capabilities across the AI stack, Forrester can differentiate itself, capture market share, and position itself as an integrated AI leader. Developing cutting-edge solutions that address clients' evolving needs, supported by enhanced industry expertise, will enable Forrester to challenge Gartner's leadership position and emerge as a dominant force in the dynamic AI-driven research and advisory market.

——————

AI Chipset Manufacturers

Graphcore (UK) - Sequoia Capital, Atomico, Sofina, Merian Chrysalis

SambaNova Systems (US) - Google Ventures, Intel Capital, Walden International

Groq (US) - TDK Ventures, Social Capital, D1 Capital Partners

Mythic (US) - Lux Capital, DCVC, Lockheed Martin Ventures

Untether AI (Canada) - Intel Capital, Radical Ventures

AI Platform Providers

DataRobot (US) - NEA, Sapphire Ventures, Meritech Capital Partners

H2O.ai (US) - Goldman Sachs, NVIDIA GPU Ventures, Nexus Venture Partners

Dataiku (France) - FirstMark Capital, Alven Capital, Iconiq Capital

Domino Data Lab (US) - Sequoia Capital, Coatue Management,

Bloomberg Beta

Determined AI (US) - GV, Amplify Partners, CRV

Industry-specific AI Startups

Lumiata (Healthcare, US) - Khosla Ventures, Blue Venture Fund

Quantexa (Financial Services, UK) - AlbionVC, HSBC, British Patient Capital

Uptake (Industrial, US) - Baillie Gifford, Revolution Growth

Transmetrics (Logistics, Bulgaria) - LAUNCHub Ventures, Speedinvest

Zymergen (Biotechnology, US) - SoftBank Vision Fund, DCVC, True Ventures

Knowledge Sharing Platforms

Weights & Biases (US) - Coatue Management, Insight Partners
Hugging Face (US) - Coatue Management, Addition, Betaworks
Neptune.ai (Poland) - btov Partners, Rheingau Founders
Comet.ml (US) - Trilogy Equity Partners, Two Sigma Ventures
MLflow (Databricks, US) - Andreessen Horowitz, NEA, Battery Ventures

Recommended soundtrack: Stagolee, Mississippi Hurt John

Integrating AI-Powered Solutions for Gartner Conferences:

Enhancing the Attendee Experience

Leveraging the AI Vendor's Technology on Apple iPhone Platforms

As part of the strategic partnership between Gartner and the AI vendor, a key focus would be the seamless integration of the AI-powered solutions onto Apple iPhone platforms. This would provide Gartner conference attendees, who are often equipped with the latest iOS devices, with a convenient and highly personalized experience.

The AI vendor's technology would be embedded into a dedicated Gartner conference mobile application, allowing attendees to access a range of intelligent features and services directly from their iPhones. This integration would ensure a frictionless user experience, enabling attendees to easily navigate the conference, access relevant information, and engage with Gartner's offerings.

Personalized Digital Assistants for Gartner Clients

At the heart of this integrated solution would be the deployment of personalized digital assistants for Gartner's clients attending the conferences. Each attendee would be assigned a dedicated AI-powered assistant, tailored to their specific needs and preferences.

These AI-powered assistants would serve as the attendees' personal concierges, providing a range of valuable services and functionalities, including:

Intelligent Conference Navigation

The assistants would guide attendees through the conference schedule, provide real-time updates on session locations and timing, and help them optimize their conference experience.

Personalized Recommendations

Leveraging Gartner's extensive client data and the AI vendor's advanced analytics capabilities, the assistants would provide personalized recommendations on sessions, networking opportunities, and other relevant conference activities.

Research and Knowledge Support

The assistants would serve as the attendees' own research partners, providing on-demand access to Gartner's vast repository of research notes, insights, and specialized knowledge. Attendees could seamlessly ask questions and receive curated responses, enhancing their learning and decision-making during the conference.

Networking and Connection Facilitation

The assistants would help attendees identify and connect with relevant peers, industry experts, and Gartner analysts, facilitating valuable networking opportunities and collaborative discussions.

Central Repository and Knowledge Engine

To power the personalized digital assistants and ensure a seamless integration with Gartner's research and knowledge base, the AI-powered solution would leverage a centralized repository and knowledge engine.

This centralized repository would serve as the backbone, housing Gartner's extensive research notes, data sets, and specialized knowledge. The AI vendor's advanced natural language processing and machine learning algorithms would continuously mine and extract insights from this repository, enabling the digital assistants to provide accurate, relevant, and up-to-date information to the conference attendees.

The knowledge engine would also feed into Gartner's own research and content creation processes, helping the firm identify emerging trends, generate specialized research notes, and further enhance its position as a thought leader in the industry.

By combining the AI vendor's technological capabilities with Gartner's industry expertise and extensive data, this integrated solution would deliver a transformative and highly personalized experience for Gartner's conference attendees, ultimately strengthening the firm's value proposition and driving further growth in its Conferences segment.

AI-powered event management: By integrating AI solutions, Gartner can streamline conference planning, logistics, and attendee engagement. According to Grand View Research, the global event management software market size was valued at USD 6.4 billion in 2021 and is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.8% from 2022 to 2030.

Personalized content recommendations: AI-powered assistants can provide tailored content recommendations based on attendees' interests, boosting engagement and value. The global content recommendation engine market is projected to reach USD 12.03 billion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 33.1% from 2020 to 2025, as reported by MarketsandMarkets.

Virtual and hybrid events: The acquisition could help Gartner expand into the growing virtual and hybrid event market, which has gained traction due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Research and Markets forecasts that the global virtual events market will reach USD 774.1 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 23.7% from 2020 to 2030.

Data analytics and insights: By leveraging AI and machine learning, Gartner can derive valuable insights from conference data, enhancing its research and advisory services. According to IDC, the worldwide big data and business analytics market is expected to grow from USD 189.1 billion in 2019 to USD 274.3 billion by 2022, with a CAGR of 13.2%.

AI-powered networking and matchmaking: AI can facilitate meaningful connections and collaborations among conference attendees. The global AI-based networking market is expected to reach USD 3.5 billion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 47.8% from 2020 to 2025, as reported by MarketsandMarkets.

… .. . and an amazing acquisition … .. . ?

————————————

The Chatbot Arena rankings are based on over 400,000 human preference votes comparing the outputs of different AI models. This crowdsourced approach provides an interesting perspective compared to other benchmarks.

All three versions of Anthropic's Claude 3 - Opus, Sonnet and Haiku - are now in the top 10, showcasing the impressive capabilities of Anthropic's latest models. Even the smaller Haiku model is performing at a GPT-4 level according to user preferences.

However, the scores between Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4 are very close. With GPT-5 expected sometime this year, the top spot may not be held by Anthropic for long. The AI chatbot landscape remains very competitive.

Proprietary models from companies like Anthropic, OpenAI and Google continue to dominate the top 20 compared to open-source alternatives. However, Meta's upcoming open-source Llama 3 model and efforts by figures like Emad Mostaque to focus on more decentralized AI could change this dynamic going forward.

Recommended movie clip: Mr Robinson’s neighborhood

—————-

Based on Gartner's 2023 10-K filing, the company reported the following financial information:

Total revenues: $5,906,956,000
Net income: $882,466,000
Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted): 79,680,000
Diluted earnings per share (EPS): $11.08

The company does not explicitly disclose the total employee-related expenses in its 10-K. However, we can use the Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses as a proxy, which includes employee-related costs. In 2023, Gartner's SG&A expenses were $2,701,542,000.

Assuming a 33% reduction in employee-related expenses (using SG&A as a proxy), the adjusted SG&A expenses would be:
$2,701,542,000 * (1 - 0.33) = $1,810,033,140

The reduction in SG&A expenses would result in an increase in net income. Assuming all other income and expenses remain constant, the new net income would be:
$882,466,000 + ($2,701,542,000 - $1,810,033,140) = $1,773,974,860

Using the new net income and the same weighted average shares outstanding (diluted), the new EPS would be:
$1,773,974,860 / 79,680,000 = $22.26

Gartner's stock price as of December 31, 2023, was not provided in the 10-K filing. However, assuming the P/E ratio remains constant, we can estimate the new stock price based on the new EPS.

Original P/E ratio = Stock price / Original EPS
New stock price = New EPS * Original P/E ratio

Please note that this is a simplified calculation based on the limited information provided in the 10-K filing. In reality, reducing employee-related expenses by 33% would likely have other impacts on the company's operations, revenue, and other expenses, which would affect the net income and EPS. Additionally, the stock price is influenced by various factors beyond just the P/E ratio, such as market conditions, investor sentiment, and company performance.

————

Based on the information provided, it seems likely that Gartner and IDC, as leading technology research and advisory firms, will need to develop artificial intelligence engines to remain competitive and relevant in the rapidly evolving AI industry. The emergence of the 7th layer of the AI stack, focused on AI collaboration and knowledge sharing, presents a significant opportunity for these firms to leverage their extensive research, market analysis, and strategic insights to facilitate the development of more advanced and adaptable AI systems.

Gartner, in particular, could potentially pioneer the AI Collective and Knowledge Sharing space by developing tools and frameworks that enable the integration and sharing of AI models within its vast network of enterprise clients, technology providers, and industry experts. By mapping the potential of technology companies based on the addresses and connections of key stakeholders in their equity stack, Gartner could create a powerful AI engine that facilitates collaboration and knowledge exchange across industries.

This AI engine could leverage Gartner's extensive research on AI market trends, vendor capabilities, and best practices to provide tailored recommendations and insights to clients looking to implement or improve their AI strategies. By analyzing the collective knowledge and experiences of AI practitioners within its network, Gartner could identify emerging trends, anticipate challenges, and propose solutions that drive innovation and optimize AI investments.

Moreover, by applying selection theory and leveraging CEO addresses and their organic networks, Gartner could develop a sophisticated methodology for assessing the AI potential and readiness of technology companies. This approach would involve analyzing the expertise, connections, and resources available to key decision-makers and influencers within a company's equity stack, as well as their ability to drive AI adoption and innovation.

For example, Gartner could examine the AI-related patents, publications, and partnerships associated with a company's leadership team, board members, and major investors to gauge its AI capabilities and growth potential. By mapping these insights to industry benchmarks and best practices, Gartner could provide actionable recommendations to help companies optimize their AI strategies and investments.

As the AI market continues to evolve and mature, Gartner and IDC will need to stay at the forefront of AI research and thought leadership to maintain their position as trusted advisors to enterprise clients. By developing cutting-edge AI engines that facilitate collaboration, knowledge sharing, and strategic decision-making, these firms can help shape the future of AI and drive innovation across industries.

However, the development of such AI engines will also require careful consideration of ethical, legal, and governance issues related to data privacy, security, and responsible AI practices. Gartner and IDC will need to work closely with clients, regulators, and industry partners to establish trust, transparency, and accountability in their AI initiatives.

In conclusion, the development of AI engines by Gartner and IDC represents a natural evolution of their role as technology research and advisory firms in the age of artificial intelligence. By leveraging their extensive market insights, client networks, and thought leadership, these firms can help drive the development of more advanced, collaborative, and impactful AI systems that transform industries and shape the future of technology. However, the success of these initiatives will depend on a strong commitment to ethical, responsible, and transparent AI practices that prioritize the needs and interests of all stakeholders.

——————-

Company Note: Gartner, Inc.

Overview
Gartner, Inc. (NYSE: IT) is a leading research and advisory company that provides insights, advice, and tools for leaders in IT, finance, HR, customer service and support, legal and compliance, marketing, sales, and supply chain functions across the world. With a comprehensive portfolio of services, including the Gartner Research insights, the Gartner Conferences, and the Gartner Consulting, the company is well-positioned to help clients make informed decisions and stay ahead of the curve in the rapidly evolving technology landscape.

AI Strategy and Positioning
As the artificial intelligence (AI) market continues to grow and mature, Gartner has recognized the need to develop advanced AI capabilities to remain competitive and provide cutting-edge insights to its clients. The company has been investing heavily in AI research and development, focusing on areas such as natural language processing, machine learning, and data analytics.

Gartner's AI strategy revolves around leveraging its extensive market research, client networks, and thought leadership to create powerful AI engines that facilitate collaboration, knowledge sharing, and strategic decision-making. By analyzing the collective knowledge and experiences of AI practitioners within its network, Gartner aims to identify emerging trends, anticipate challenges, and propose solutions that drive innovation and optimize AI investments for its clients.

7th Layer Opportunity: AI Collective and Knowledge Sharing
Gartner is particularly well-positioned to capitalize on the emerging 7th layer of the AI stack, which focuses on AI collaboration and knowledge sharing. With its vast network of enterprise clients, technology providers, and industry experts, Gartner could potentially pioneer this space by developing tools and frameworks that enable the integration and sharing of AI models and best practices.

By mapping the AI potential of technology companies based on the expertise, connections, and resources of key stakeholders in their equity stack, Gartner could create a sophisticated methodology for assessing AI readiness and growth opportunities. This approach, grounded in applied selection theory, would involve analyzing factors such as AI-related patents, publications, partnerships, and leadership expertise to provide tailored recommendations and insights to clients.

Competitive Landscape
Gartner faces competition from other major players in the technology research and advisory space, such as IDC, Forrester, and Deloitte. However, the company's extensive market presence, comprehensive service offerings, and thought leadership position it well to maintain its competitive edge.

To stay ahead of the curve, Gartner will need to continue investing in AI research and development, expand its client networks, and foster partnerships with key stakeholders in the AI ecosystem. The company will also need to navigate the ethical, legal, and governance challenges associated with AI, working closely with clients, regulators, and industry partners to establish trust, transparency, and accountability in its AI initiatives.

Financial Performance and Growth Potential
Gartner has demonstrated strong financial performance in recent years, with steady revenue growth and expanding margins. The company's diversified business model, which includes research subscriptions, conferences, and consulting services, provides multiple avenues for growth and helps mitigate risk.

As the demand for AI-powered insights and solutions continues to grow, Gartner is well-positioned to capitalize on this trend and drive further growth. The company's investments in AI research and development, coupled with its extensive market presence and thought leadership, position it to capture a significant share of the AI market in the coming years.

Conclusion
Gartner, Inc. is a leading technology research and advisory firm that is poised to play a significant role in shaping the future of artificial intelligence. By developing advanced AI engines that facilitate collaboration, knowledge sharing, and strategic decision-making, Gartner can help drive innovation and optimize AI investments for its clients across industries.

The company's focus on the emerging 7th layer of the AI stack, AI Collective and Knowledge Sharing, presents a significant growth opportunity, as does its sophisticated methodology for assessing AI potential based on the expertise and connections of key stakeholders in technology companies' equity stacks.

With strong financial performance, a diversified business model, and a thought leadership position in the AI market, Gartner is well-positioned to navigate the challenges and opportunities of the AI revolution and deliver significant value to its clients and shareholders in the years to come.

Recommended movie clip: Blues Brothers

—————————————

Event Note: Cushing Oil Reserves Volatility and Its Relationship to Broader Economic Trends - Update

Introduction

In light of recent developments at the Cushing, Oklahoma oil storage hub, it is essential to reexamine the relationship between volatility in Cushing oil reserves and broader economic trends. The new information suggests that Cushing's oil reserves have reached critically low levels, raising concerns about oil quality, operational challenges, and potential price fluctuations.

Cushing's Current Situation
As of September 15, 2023, Cushing's oil reserves have dropped to just under 23 million barrels, the lowest level since July 2022. This significant drawdown is attributed to strong refining and export demand, coupled with factors such as high interest rates and unfavorable future prices compared to spot prices. Analysts expect further draws in the coming weeks, with some predicting reserves to fall below 20 million barrels, which is considered the operational low for the storage hub.

Implications of Low Reserves

Oil Quality

As reserves dwindle, concerns arise about the quality of the remaining oil. Water and sediments settling at the bottom of storage tanks can render the oil unusable or below the required standards for refiners and exporters.

Operational Challenges

Extremely low reserve levels can pose operational difficulties, such as the inability to completely remove oil from certain types of storage tanks and the formation of combustible vapors when tank roofs come into contact with the base.

Price Pressures

The scarcity of oil at Cushing can exert upward pressure on prices, particularly for the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil futures contract, which is tied to the price of oil delivered to Cushing. This price pressure may compound the already tight global supply situation resulting from OPEC+ production cuts.

Potential Outcomes and Broader Economic Implications

Limited Inventory Rebuilding

While some analysts believe that seasonal refinery maintenance in the autumn may help rebuild Cushing stocks, others argue that the strong demand for fuel will prompt refiners to quickly resume full-scale operations, limiting the potential for significant inventory replenishment.

Export Demand

The lifting of the U.S. crude oil export ban in 2015 has made Cushing more susceptible to international market dynamics. With strong global demand for crude oil, any incremental production is likely to be exported, further constraining Cushing's ability to rebuild reserves.

Price Volatility

The combination of low reserves, quality concerns, and operational challenges at Cushing may contribute to increased price volatility in the oil market. This volatility can have ripple effects on various sectors of the economy, influencing inflation, consumer spending, and business investment decisions.

Economic Growth and Inflation

If the situation at Cushing leads to sustained higher oil prices, it could potentially dampen economic growth by increasing energy costs for businesses and consumers. Additionally, higher oil prices may contribute to inflationary pressures, which could prompt central banks to take action to control inflation.

Palladium: A Comprehensive Report

Entry price: $978

Quantity of currency: 1/3 of Platinum allocation which is 1/3 of currency. Other categories of currency gold (1/3 of currency category), Ethereum (1/3 of currency category).

Other platinum allocations:

1/3 Rhodium of platinum allocation at $4,200-$4,600

1/3 of platinum category at or below $1,000

————

Introduction:
Palladium is a rare, silver-white metal that belongs to the platinum group metals (PGMs). It has gained significant attention due to its unique properties and diverse applications, particularly in industrial processes, currency, and fuel cell technology. This report will delve into the history, properties, and various uses of palladium, as well as discuss its potential future in the context of hype cycles and technological utility.

First Known Industrial Use:
The first recorded industrial use of palladium dates back to 1803 when William Hyde Wollaston, an English chemist, discovered the metal in crude platinum ore from South America. Wollaston named the element after the recently discovered asteroid Pallas, which was named after the Greek goddess of wisdom, Pallas Athena. Initially, palladium found use in dentistry and watchmaking due to its durability and resistance to tarnishing.

Unique Properties:

Palladium possesses several unique properties that make it valuable in various applications:

High melting point: Palladium has a melting point of 1,554.9°C (2,830.8°F), making it suitable for high-temperature applications.

Catalytic properties: Palladium is an excellent catalyst, particularly in hydrogenation and dehydrogenation reactions.

Hydrogen absorption: One of palladium's most notable properties is its ability to absorb up to 900 times its own volume of hydrogen at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. This property makes palladium a key component in hydrogen storage and purification systems.

Ductility and malleability: Palladium is both ductile and malleable, allowing it to be easily shaped into thin sheets or wires.

Electrical conductivity: Palladium has a relatively high electrical conductivity, making it suitable for use in electronic components.

Importance in Currency
Palladium has gained importance in the world of currency due to its rarity and value. Some countries, such as Russia and Canada, have issued palladium coins as legal tender. The American Eagle Palladium Bullion Coin, introduced by the United States Mint in 2017, contains one troy ounce (31.103 grams) of 99.95% pure palladium. These coins serve as a store of value and a hedge against inflation for investors.

Importance in Fuel Cell Technology
Palladium plays a crucial role in fuel cell technology, particularly in Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cells. In PEM fuel cells, palladium is used as a catalyst in the electrodes, facilitating the electrochemical reactions that generate electricity from hydrogen and oxygen. Palladium's unique ability to absorb hydrogen and its catalytic properties make it an ideal choice for this application. As fuel cell technology continues to advance, the demand for palladium in this sector is expected to grow.

Hype Cycles and Palladium
Palladium's price and technological utility can be influenced by hype cycles, which are characterized by periods of enthusiasm, inflated expectations, and subsequent disillusionment before a technology reaches a stable level of productivity. As new applications for palladium emerge, particularly in the field of clean energy and fuel cell technology, the metal may experience price fluctuations driven by market sentiment and speculation. However, as these technologies mature and find widespread adoption, the demand for palladium is likely to stabilize and grow over the long term.

Conclusion
Palladium's unique properties, including its catalytic abilities, hydrogen absorption, and durability, have made it a valuable metal in various industries and applications. Its role in currency and fuel cell technology highlights its importance in both financial and technological contexts. Given the potential for palladium to play a key role in the development and adoption of clean energy technologies, an appropriate holding period for this metal could span one or two technology cycles, or approximately 15 to 20 years. As the world continues to focus on sustainable energy solutions, the demand for palladium is likely to remain strong, making it a metal worth considering for long-term investment.

Recommended soundtrack: Freebird, Lynyrd Skynyrd

Technology Trends in Artificial Intelligence

Introduction

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a rapidly evolving field that is transforming various industries and sectors. The provided documents highlight several key trends and developments in AI technology, focusing on the AI market landscape, vendor strategies, and emerging applications. This report summarizes the main technology trends in AI based on the information presented in the documents.

Key AI Technology Trends

Expansion of AI Chips & Hardware Infrastructure The documents indicate a growing focus on AI-specific hardware, such as AI accelerators and processors, to support the increasing demand for AI workloads. Companies like NVIDIA, Intel (Habana Labs), AMD (Xilinx), and Qualcomm are investing heavily in developing specialized AI chips and hardware infrastructure to improve performance and efficiency.

Advancements in AI Frameworks & Libraries AI frameworks and libraries continue to evolve, with major players like Google (TensorFlow), Meta (PyTorch), and Microsoft (ONNX) actively developing and improving their offerings. These advancements aim to simplify AI development, enhance performance, and enable seamless deployment across different hardware platforms.

Emergence of Powerful AI Algorithms & Models The documents highlight the development of large-scale, state-of-the-art AI models like OpenAI's GPT-4, Google's PaLM, DeepMind's Chinchilla, Anthropic's Claude, and Meta's OPT. These models push the boundaries of natural language processing, generation, and understanding, paving the way for more sophisticated AI applications.

Growing Importance of AI Data & Datasets The quality and quantity of data play a crucial role in AI development. Companies like Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, and Apple are investing in building large, diverse, and high-quality datasets to train and improve their AI models. The documents also mention the increasing adoption of data annotation tools to facilitate the creation of labeled datasets.

Emphasis on AI Application & Integration There is a growing focus on integrating AI capabilities into various applications and platforms. Companies are developing AI-powered solutions for industries such as healthcare, finance, retail, and manufacturing. The documents highlight the efforts of vendors like NVIDIA, Intel, Google, Meta, and Microsoft in providing tools and platforms for seamless AI integration.

Expansion of AI Distribution & Ecosystem The AI ecosystem is expanding, with the emergence of marketplaces and platforms for sharing and distributing AI models, tools, and services. Initiatives like NVIDIA's GPU Cloud (NGC), Google's TensorFlow Hub, and HuggingFace are facilitating the democratization of AI by providing access to pre-trained models and resources.

Emergence of Collaborative AI & Knowledge Sharing The documents introduce the concept of an "AI Collective and Knowledge Sharing" layer, which focuses on enabling collaboration and knowledge exchange among AI units. This trend emphasizes the development of technologies, protocols, and ethical frameworks to support the creation of more advanced and adaptive AI systems through collective intelligence.

Conclusion
The technology trends in AI highlight the rapid advancements taking place across various layers of the AI stack. From hardware infrastructure and frameworks to algorithms, data, and applications, companies are investing heavily in developing cutting-edge AI technologies. The emphasis on collaboration, knowledge sharing, and the democratization of AI through expanding ecosystems is also shaping the future of AI development. As these trends continue to evolve, they are expected to drive innovation, create new opportunities, and transform industries worldwide.